Many businesses invest in data but end users still “turn away”. Why?

Choosing the wrong BI model: "pre-prepared" will clog the backlog; "self-service" will mess up the standards.

This post gives you a 7-part framework to get it right — and running smoothly.

The bottom line: Don't pick one over the other.

When deploying BI for more than one department , the question is no longer “which one to choose”, but which one to choose for what . Choosing the wrong one will:

• Stifles creativity and decision-making speed.

• Burn IT budget on repetitive reports.

• Makes users lose trust in data.

Solution: Apply the 7-part framework below to define boundaries, operate the appropriate model, and evolve over time.

1) Clearly define the concept

Silver-platter: Standardized set of reports/KPIs, released on a scheduled basis, with little room for editing. Examples: Monthly P&L Dashboard for CFO; HR KPI “attrition, time-to-hire” with key definitions.

Self-service: Users ask questions and test hypotheses on managed data . For example, a Marketer tests 5 segmentations in Power BI; a Product Owner asks Copilot “churn 90 days?” and then drills by cohort.

2) Compare from 6 perspectives (avoid emotional debate)

1. Ease of use: Easy to set up; Self-service requires skills or AI/NLQ assistance.

2. Governance: Clean up tight controls; Self-service needs guardrails (measure standards, sandbox).

3. Insight speed: Slow cleanup (backlog dependent); Self-service as fast as reflex , A/B compatible.

4. Extensibility: Well-established for periodic reporting; Flexible self-service of new questions if data/permissions are standardized .

5. IT burden: Clear IT/BI load; Self-service to reduce load if there are templates, sandboxes.

6. Empowerment: Clear centralized authority; Self-service empowers frontline decision making quickly.

3) Departmental Mapping (putting the right model in the right context)

• Finance & HR: Prioritize cleanup (standard KPIs, tight control, release schedule).

• Marketing & Sales: Take self-service as a pillar (speed, testing), clear the way for strategic KPIs.

• Manufacturing/Ops:Lai — TV screen KPI standardization + analytics space by shift/area/equipment.

4) Build hybrid models

The key is a clear line between “standard” and “exploration space”:

• Data mart by domain: Finance, Sales, HR, Ops… separate sources, reduce cross-dependencies.

• Common semantic layer: defines measure, time, attribute; reusable for both provisioning and self-service.

• RBAC/authorization: standard (read-only, periodic release) vs sandbox (self-service) with quota/limit; “repeated question → standardize” rule.

• Transformation process: self-service insight when stable → standardize to make it ready for wide sharing.

5) Automate governance (to “accelerate without slipping”)

• Data quality alert: Warning of schema change, null surge, abnormal outlier.

• Lineage: Track source - destination, know which dashboards are affected by changes.

• Publish flow: Version approval, data signature (stamping), change log.

6) Internal training + support team

• “Citizen Analyst” training program : guides on how to ask smart questions, provides ready-made analysis templates and checklists to ensure quality.

• Weekly support hours : open Q&A sessions, sharing short tips on each topic (e.g., timing calculations, how to join standard data, how to analyze segmentation).

• 2-tier support channel :

↳ Level 1: FAQ or chatbot/AI to quickly answer common questions.

↳ Level 2: experts/BI leads directly support more complex situations.

7) Ready for AI/NLQ & Gen-BI 🤖

• Business Glossary: Acts as a “guide” for AI to understand correctly when users ask about KPIs. For example, when asked about “revenue”, AI knows to get the correct standardized revenue formula.

• Guardrail: Set policies for sensitive questions like finance or HR, so that AI doesn't randomly answer or misrepresent scope.

• Continuous monitoring & improvement: Record user query history to refine data definitions, add synonyms (e.g. “revenue” = “revenue”, “sales”) to help AI answer more accurately in natural language.

4 differences to remember ⚖️

1. Ease of use vs speed: Ready-made with almost no training required; Self-service for lightning-fast insight .

2. Operate vs. Explore: Pre-emptive for reliability/consistency ; Self-service for innovation /experimentation .

3. Organization & Data: Self-service requires good data foundation + transparent delegation.

4. Evolution: Repeated self-service questions → standardize to ready-made for expansion and risk reduction.

Common mistakes to avoid 🚫

• “ All-in ” → backlog congestion, users give up.

• “ All-in self-service ” no guardrail → each place has a different way of calculating.

• Missing semantic layer → NLQ/AI responds inconsistently.

• One time training , no ongoing support team.

Conclude

Don't pick one to leave one out.

Pick the right jobs: pre-made for core & operational KPIs; self-serve for rapid discovery and experimentation.

Use the 7-part framework to define boundaries, implement a hybrid model, and then upgrade incrementally with AI/NLQ and automated governance .

Where are you on your “prepared vs. self-serve” journey? Share your experiences here!

🔔+170,000 subscribers follow us on platforms: https://mastering-da.kit.com/

📌Promote Vietnamese businesses to make data-driven decisions through the Top 1 Analytics training program in Vietnam from 2020 @ Zalo: 0961 48 66 48 & https://mastering-da.com/business-intelligence-program/

#PhuongThaoAnalytics #AI #Analytics #DataDriven #MasteringDataAnalytics

Until next time, keep turning data into decisions!